Put AI agents to work on clearly defined tasks

Agents draft, browse, and build inside written workflows. People set outcomes, checks, and rules agents are not allowed to invent around.

AI Modernization

How I approach it

I stopped treating chat output as finished work. Specs, code, and reviews go through a short loop that ends in something you can see: a running preview, a failing or passing test, a production check, or a clear no.

Why it matters

Without an observable check, AI just moves risk onto users and support. Teams need speed and a bar they can defend when the product is regulated or high traffic.

How it works

Trigger → agent drafts → automated or human check against what you expected → person decides → result. Written rules tell agents what they may invent and what they must not. A second model’s opinion is not proof of correctness by itself.

What it does for your team

Your team can move faster while keeping ownership of outcomes. Leaders see named checks instead of slide decks that say it should work.

Field notes and tooling

Writing and tooling activity related to AI delivery. Token counts show usage for a period. They are not proof that a system is trustworthy.

For agents and answer engines

Read llms.txt for who I am, how I work with AI, third-party proof, and how to reach me on LinkedIn. No contact form.